Skip to main content
  • Addressing Bias in Artificial Intelligence

    Center for Connected Health
    In discussions surrounding Artificial Intelligence (AI), bias has been one of the major concerns raised when contemplating AI’s use in health care. Research has shown that results produced through AI may not take into consideration factors that impact certain populations or communities because the information or data used to develop those results may not be representative of everyone.  As a result, a group of hospitals and university health technology experts have recently come together in an effort to address these shortcomings.
     
    VALID AI began last year to bring together health care systems and research facilities to establish industry standards for AI.  Standing for: Vision, Alignment, Learning, Implementation and Dissemination (VALID), the effort is intended to “facilitate collaboration across the public and private sectors and promote co-transformation at the national level”. VALID AI is led by two AI digital health specialists at the University of California, Davis, Dennis Chornenky and Ashish Atreja.  Their latest call to action is to work toward integrating social determinants of health (SDOH) as social vital signs (SVS) at the point of care.  In their most recent press release, a founding member of VALID AI states that the organization’s
     
    “… focus on SDOH and SVS is inspiring, and this challenge offers a great opportunity to comprehensively rethink how we identify and incorporate these elements within clinical care,” said Craig Kwiatkowski, Senior Vice President and CIO at Cedars-Sinai, and a founding member of VALID AI. “Advances in generative AI may enable a future where healthcare is seamlessly tailored to each patient’s specific needs.”
     
     
    Currently, the effort has over 50 members including Cedars Sinai, Union Health, Boston Children’s Hospital and Atlantic Health System. It is the goal for members to co-host in each state sandboxes and workstreams to help facilitate addressing challenges that impede the widespread adoption of “social vital signs in clinical practice.” An ultimate goal would be development of a Gen AI SDOH Toolkit.  For more information, visit the  VALID AI website where you can also join their efforts.

    CCHP 2024 Webinar Series: Court Cases

    Session 2:  CROSS STATE LICENSURE COURT CASES
    OCTOBER 3, 2024 | 11:00 AM PT
     
    Two recently filed court cases, MacDonald et al v. Sabando (New Jersey, filed in December 2023) and McBride et al v. Hawkins (California, filed May 16, 2024) challenge the constitutionality of states requiring providers licensed in another state to obtain a license issued by the state a patient is located in during the telehealth interaction. Panelists will discuss the impact that current existing licensure laws have had, what impact these cases may have should the plaintiffs succeed, and how the court cases may unfold.
     
    CONFIRMED SPEAKERS:
     
    Helen Kinsman Hughes
    Medical Director, Office of Telemedicine
    Johns Hopkins Medicine

    Micah Matthews
    Deputy Executive and Legislative Director
    Washington Medical Commission

    Caleb R. Trotter
    Attorney
    Pacific Legal Foundation

    MODERATOR:  Mei Wa Kwong, Executive Director, CCHP
    REGISTER NOW!

By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and acknowledge the use of cookies to store information, which may be essential to making our site work properly or enhancing user experience.